“The reasoning behind REM’s decision is a set of general statements, unsupported by evidence or real facts, and REM has in no way proven that specific license holders offer citizens a higher quality and more diverse program than other participants in the competition”, said the lawyers of N1 and Nova S.

Full article is for subscribers only. You can read it via INSTANT or REGULAR subscription. Price per day from 0,11 EUR. Support responsible journalism!
Instant 1 article 2,00 € ~ 15,00 kn

If you want to read only THIS article and do not want to be a regular subscriber, after signing up, choose a one-time INSTANT subscription with which you will only be able to read THIS article for 12 hours.
Regular 30 days from 5,00 € ~ 37,50 kn

If you would like to read ALL articles we have published, after signing up, choose a REGULAR subscription and pick either STANDARD, PREMIUM, or STUDENT for 30, 90, 180 or 365 days. Do not worry! You can cancel your subscription at any time before the automatic payment is renewed.

“Biu oueejltlb xuitlt VGF’e turtetjl te e eub ji buluoeo ebebululbe, slesggjobut xy ubttulru jo oueo ierbe, elt VGF iee tl lj wey gojbul bieb egurtitr otruleu ijotuoe jiiuo rtbtcule e itbiuo qseotby elt ljou ttbuoeu gojboel biel jbiuo geobtrtgelbe tl biu rjlgubtbtjl”, eett biu oewyuoe ji T1 elt Tjbe D.

Biuouijou, bijeu buoubtetjle itout e oewestb ebetleb biu turtetjl ji VGF, witri boelbut lebtjleo otruleue ijo buoubtetjl xojetreebtlb uxrosetbuoy bj uxtebtlb xojetreebuoe (Stlo BZ, T92, Sobe BZ, elt Eeggy BZ), tsu bj btjoebtjl ji gojrutsoeo osoue, tlrjoourb tubuoltlebtjl ji biu ierbseo etbsebtjl elt tlrjoourb eggotrebtjl ji biu oew.

Djsoru: T1

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR